Zuma himself committed to repaying legal fees, says judge
The DA and the EFF both referred to repeated undertakings by Zuma to repay his legal fees, amid the R15m to R32m already spent on legal bids to prevent his prosecution.
Former South African president Jacob Zuma sits in the dock of the High Court of Pietermaritzburg on July 27, 2018 for his hearing over 16 corruption charges. He is charged with 16 counts that include fraud corruption and racketeering. These charges relate to 783 payments which he allegedly received as a bribe to protect French arms company Thales from an investigation into the controversial multi-billion rand arms deal. The alleged bribe was facilitated by Zumas former financial adviser Schabir Shaik. / AFP PHOTO / POOL / Phill MAGAKOE
Former president Jacob Zuma seems to have shot himself in the foot by repeatedly undertaking to repay his legal fees if a series of applications aimed at thwarting his criminal trial do not succeed, while failing to repay a cent.
The Democratic Alliance (DA) and the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) both referred to repeated undertakings by Zuma to repay his legal fees as one of the reasons he should be made to repay between R15 million and R32 million already spent on legal bids to prevent his prosecution.
Judge Pieter Meyer, one of three judges hearing the parties’ applications, also referred to this undertaking while Zuma’s advocate, Thabani Masuku, argued in defence of state funding for his client.
Masuku submitted that the application should be thrown out because the DA and EFF took unreasonably long to launch their applications, which increased Zuma’s potential liability and prejudiced him.
However, Meyer said there was no indication from Zuma that he would have litigated “on a less luxurious scale” if he had to pay for it.
“He undertook to repay … that he’s now (some 12 years later) called to repay does not make any difference.”
Advocate Tembeka Ngcukaitobi, for the EFF, argued that according to their calculations, Zuma had spent over R32 million on litigation so far, but no one was certain as the state attorney appeared not to have properly managed Zuma’s legal costs.
He said it was clear from the criminal charges that Zuma was accused of abusing his position as MEC of economic affairs for KwaZulu-Natal to benefit Schabir Shaik.
Zuma had access to unlimited funds and abused his position as MEC, as deputy president and as president to get preferential treatment, with taxpayers having to pay for everything, he added.
Ngcukaitobi said taxpayers would keep paying Zuma’s legal fees indefinitely if the court did not put a stop to it.
For more news your way, download The Citizen’s app for iOS and Android.
For more news your way
Download our app and read this and other great stories on the move. Available for Android and iOS.
