Parliament’s Portfolio Committee on Home Affairs has adopted an interim report on the Electoral Amendment Bill despite some parties opposing parts of the proposed legislation.
The report will now go to the National Assembly, with the committee seeking permission to broaden the scope of the Bill since substantive amendments were made to it.
The committee has also agreed to make the Bill with the new changes public for written submissions, but only for a period of two weeks after having previously held provincial public hearings in March.
The Bill will be published once the National Assembly has processes the amendments, according to the committee’s secretariat, Eddie Mathonsi.
ALSO READ: Electoral Amendment Bill remains a complex issue
“After the National Assembly has granted permission then we will be able to advertise the Bill without coming back to the committee,” Mathonsi said during a parliamentary meeting on Tuesday.
The committee has been tasked to amend the Electoral Act 73 of 1998 to allow independent candidates to stand in national and provincial elections in the future, and to substitute Schedule 1A, among other things.
Despite the committee having finalised its deliberations on the Bill, the Democratic Alliance (DA) and the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) have objected to the final version of it.
The committee has identified certain sections of the Electoral Act that require an amendment as well as subjects that the Bill does not address.
READ MORE: MPs at ‘loggerheads’ over parts of Electoral Amendment Bill
This follows the public submissions received by the committee and deliberations during its meetings.
The committee is seeking the National Assembly’s permission to include the following:
There’s also some significant changes to Schedule 1A of the Electoral Act, which is a system of representation in National Assembly and provincial legislatures.
These changes include that:
RELATED: ‘New Electoral Act could just be a sneaky way to steal power’ from voters
The committee has until 10 December 2022, to complete its work after was granted a six-month extension by the Constitutional Court (ConCourt) almost three months ago.
It had also aimed to send the Bill to President Cyril Ramaphosa for approval by the end of September.
Meanwhile, civil society groups have threatened Parliament with legal action over the Bill having questioned whether it would be constitutional once signed into law.
The organisations argued that they made submissions to the ministerial advisory committee (MAC) and some of their proposals were favourably supported by the members of the committee in its majority recommendation on the Bill.
“We also participated, in various ways, on the parliamentary processes regarding the Electoral Amendment Bill where our submissions have similarly been sidelined. This presents us and the country with serious difficulties,” the organisations said.
Home Affairs Minister Aaron Motsoaledi appointed the MAC in February 2021, with the committee’s majority recommendation on the Bill proposing a system that combined both a mixed single-member constituency as well as proportional representation (PR) system.
However, Motsoaledi and the Department of Home Affairs chose the MAC’s minority proposal and drafted the amendment Bill that relied solely on a PR system.
NOW READ: Electoral Act changes must pass urgently to avoid constitutional crisis before 2024 polls
Download our app and read this and other great stories on the move. Available for Android and iOS.