WATCH: Did EFF push Ramaphosa to act on Zimbabwe ‘human rights abuses’?

President Emmerson Mnangagwa of Zimbabwe (left) and our own Cyril Ramaphosa at the AU Summit. Picture: Twitter (@GovernmentZA)

Was it South Africa’s political opposition, rather than the plight of Zimbabweans, that pushed Pretoria to respond?

After decades of “quiet diplomacy”, “brotherhood” and silence by the ANC-led South African government on alleged human rights abuses in Zimbabwe, the almost unthinkable happened last week – the department of international relations and cooperation issued a series of tweets in which Pretoria for the first time referred to human rights concerns in the neighbouring country, in public.

This was a complete change from the norm, where the government – a leader in the region – either did not address burning issues in Zimbabwe, or issued statements that never condemned that country’s leaders for alleged abuses.

International Relations and Cooperation Minister Lindiwe Zulu even took to the airways to say there’s a political crisis in Zimbabwe:

The ANC as a party, through secretary-general Ace Magashule, condemned the state-sponsored violence in Zimbabwe and said it was “uncalled for”:

 

There has also never been an attempt by the government to bring Zimbabwe’s ruling Zimbabwe African National Union-Patriotic Front (Zanu-PF) and opposition parties like the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC)-Alliance to the table for talks on the situation, or find a solution to the long-running crisis.

The government’s silence has been all the more deafening in the face of millions of Zimbabweans having poured over the country’s border with South Africa over years in search of safety against alleged political persecution, or simply an opportunity to earn money on which their families would survive while their own economy has been tanking.

So what brought about the change of heart – was it real empathy with and concern for the people of Zimbabwe?

ALSO READ: EFF calls for removal of the Zimbabwean Embassy in SA… or else

It appears that efforts by South African opposition parties, led by the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) and its leader Julius Malema, with its social media campaign in support of the #Zimbabweanlivesmatter movement, have been the main mover in pushing the ANC and President Cyril Ramaphosa to act. It is also notable that Ramaphosa, in his current position as chairperson of the African Union (AU), has not yet made any pronouncements on the situation in Zimbabwe on behalf of the continental body.

The crunch came last Monday evening when the EFF called for the Zimbabwean Embassy in South Africa to be removed until “they restore the human rights in that country”.

“Failure to do so will result in direct action by EFF to prevent any official from the Zimbabwean government from participating in any gathering in SA until they respect ordinary Zimbabweans,” the party said, receiving praise from both South Africans and Zimbabweans, who commended it for taking a stand.

It seems that this prompted Ramaphosa to appoint Sydney Mufamadi, a member of former presidents Nelson Mandela and Thabo Mbeki’s cabinets, and Baleka Mbete, former deputy president and speaker of the National Assembly, “as his Special Envoys to Zimbabwe, following recent reports of difficulties that the Republic of Zimbabwe is experiencing”, according to a statement from the presidency.

The two envoys arrived in Harare on Sunday, 10 August, and were expected to speak to several stakeholders, including civil society organisations, government, NGOs and political parties. But they only met with Zimbabwean President Emmerson Mnangagwa at his official residence before returning on Monday, 11 August, with the Zimbabwean status quo seemingly intact.

The envoys did indicate that they would return to Zimbabwe at a later date to meet with all stakeholders, but there has been no indication when this will happen. Government also didn’t give an action plan on engagements to resolve the Zimbabwean crisis – although the Zimbabwean government denies that there are any problems.

The envoys’ visit could be seen as a response to EFF threats, and not from a desire to call the Zimbabwean government to order.

For more news your way, download The Citizen’s app for iOS and Android.




today in print

today in print