Speaker Mapisa-Nqakula ‘can be arrested’

Facing 12 counts of corruption involving more than R4 million and one count of money-laundering, embattled National Assembly Speaker Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula was not immune from being arrested, the National Prosecuting Authority’s Investigating Directorate (ID) said yesterday.

In a damning 63-page answering affidavit, arguing for Mapisa-Nqakula’s urgent application to be struck off the roll in the High Court in Pretoria, ID deputy director of public prosecutions advocate Bheki Manyathi said every member of society was equal before the law.

Urgently seeking to stop ‘imminent arrest’

Mapisa-Nqakula is urgently seeking to stop her “imminent arrest”.

However, Manyathi said: “An arrest is one of the legally sanctioned means of securing the attendance of a suspect in court. It is not unlawful, if it is done within bounds of reason.

“At the moment there is no arrest.

ALSO READ: NPA slams Mapisa-Nqakula’s second bid to block her arrest as ‘abuse of process’

“Instead, there has been a courtesy extended to the applicant to present herself to the law enforcement agents to charge her and process her appearance in court.

“The fact that the applicant regards her so called ‘imminent arrest’ as creating urgency, does not necessarily make the matter urgent.

“I can certainly confirm that there was an agreement that the applicant would be presented by her legal representatives at Lyttleton police station for processing.”

Mapisa-Nqakula did not enjoy right ‘not to be arrested’

Manyathi said Mapisa-Nqakula did not enjoy a right “not to be arrested”.

“The case against the applicant is strong. On the basis of information available to the state, the threshold in terms of the provisions of Section 40 of the Criminal Procedure Act, has been met.

ALSO READ: NPA to request ‘substantial’ bail for Mapisa-Nqakula so she won’t ‘abscond’

“Should the decision to arrest be made, the arrest will be lawful.”

He later added: “The applicant does not have a right to access the docket at this stage.”

Not filing replying affidavit

Mapisa-Nqakula’s advocate, Reg Willis, said she had chosen not to file a replying affidavit.

Willis said Mapisa-Nqakula was seeking an interim interdict to prevent the state from arresting her pending the outcome of her first interdict application seeking an order blocking her arrest and granting her access to the evidence against her.