Pistorius forensics under fire

Under cross-examination by Barry Roux, SC, for Pistorius at his murder trial, police forensic analyst Colonel Johannes Vermeulen said at first that he did not know what happened to the missing wood splinters.

He was then shown a picture of the door, with a piece of wood, described in court as a splinter, lying on a pile of plastic next to the door in the picture.

Roux had led him into the admission that the splinter had been missed by asking him to identify various elements of the photograph of the door taken in a room at police forensics as it was being measured and examined.

“Oh so there’s some pieces…,” said Vermeulen.

Roux said, “So you see the pieces of wood?

Vermeulen replied: “It was between the plastic in the shelves and I did not pay attention to that stuff.”

The picture he was shown was taken in April 2013.

Roux extracted from him that he also did not notice another mark on the door below the handle.

He said Pistorius would say this was him kicking at the door with his prosthetic legs to break the door to free Steenkamp.

Pistorius is a double amputee who runs on specially designed “blades” as a paralympic champion and Olympic Games competitor.

He said in his bail application that he was on his stumps when he got out of bed thinking there was an intruder in the house, then fired four shots through the bathroom door, killing Steenkamp.

When he realised it was her in the toilet cubicle, he put on his “legs” and kicked the door and bashed it with a cricket bat to free her.

Vermeulen said if the mark was caused by a prosthesis it was significant.

But he asked Judge Thokozile Masipa to consider the possibility that Pistorius may have stood on the wood and stumbled as he carried Steenkamp downstairs because it would have been very “deurmekaar” (confusing).

“That mark could have been from him walking over it (the wood with the mark),” he said.

He said when the door was brought for examination it was in a body bag and the panels were loose.

Roux has already extracted from Vermeulen that he left his opinion that Pistorius was on his stumps when bashing the door with the bat out of his forensic report.

This was because he did not think it was an issue and the case file was closed. He had also only been asked to make findings on the cricket bat.

Roux ended Wednesday’s proceedings by asking him to bring in any cases and findings he had made relating to doors.

Vermeulen said he had not done any cases relating to wooden doors, but that the principles of analysis were the same.

The case was adjourned until 9.30am on Thursday.

After the adjournment the media was allowed to look at the exhibit of the door and a mock up of the toilet cubicle Steenkamp was shot in and quickly flocked forward with cameras and cellphones.

– Sapa