Flushing toilets aren’t the solution to SA’s sanitation problem

Around 65% of South Africa’s population have access to waterborne sanitation such as flushing toilets connected to a sewer network, septic tank or conservancy tank.

Another 19% have ventilated improved pit latrines, while 13% have pit toilets with no ventilation pipes.

The remaining population either have pour flush toilets, chemical toilets or composting toilets, or they use buckets. Unfortunately, about 1% of the population still practise open defecation because they have no access to any sort of toilet facility.

South Africa is a water scarce country that has faced extreme weather events in recent years. For example in 2018 Cape Town faced severe drought and the possibility of running out of water.

More recently, the east coast city of Durban was hit by floods which damaged bulk water and sanitation infrastructure.

ALSO READ: We want more toilets and better access to water, say Centurion shack dwellers

With the country’s challenges around water management and availability, it’s just not feasible and viable to continue with waterborne sanitation.

Conventional flushing toilets use around nine to 12 litres of water per flush. And that is potable water.

Moreover, according to South Africa’s latest Green Drop report, the performance of current conventional wastewater treatment works is alarming.

Only 23 out of the 995 wastewater treatment works evaluated achieved Green Drop status by scoring above 90%.

It seems practical for us to transition towards the adoption of non-sewered sanitation technologies.

What are non-sewered sanitation systems?

Non-sewered sanitation technologies collect, convey and fully treat the acceptable input onsite.

Instead of your waste going from your toilet via a sewer to a treatment works offsite, this technology treats your waste onsite and allows the treated outputs to be safely reused or disposed of.

These technologies can be installed in the household and larger systems can be implemented for schools or communities. They consist of a front end, which is your toilet facility, and a back end, which is the treatment facility.

What are the benefits of this toilet technology?

Non-sewered sanitation is less dependent on water.

It uses conventional flush (less than 6 litres), pour flush, dry toilets or novel evacuation mechanisms that use mechanical forces with little to no water. And its treated output can be reused.

READ MORE: Water has quietly become prohibitively expensive

Non-sewered sanitation fully treats faeces and urine.

The treated solid output can be used as fertiliser while the treated liquid output can be used for flushing or crop irrigation.

Our faecal and urine matter is a valuable resource.

How close is this to being a reality in South Africa?

I am involved in the training and awareness around a global standard called ISO 30500, which has been adopted in South Africa as SANS 30500.

This standard provides guidance for the design, performance and safety requirements of non-sewered sanitation systems. It also considers the sustainability of these systems over a functional life-span.

We at the University of KwaZulu-Natal, on behalf of the Water Research Commission, are coordinating the development of a certification scheme which will allow these technologies to be certified against the standard and enter the market.

Two technologies which were developed through the Reinvented Toilet Challenge funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation have been licensed by two South African companies to be manufactured in South Africa.

These technologies are being tested in the field through the South African Sanitation Technology Enterprise Programme.

The programme provides a platform for sanitation innovators and commercial partners to take their technologies from the prototype development phase to commercialisation.

ALSO READ: Basic water services in SA are in decay after years of progress

The Department of Water and Sanitation has already identified the benefits of non-sewered sanitation and recently launched the Sanitation Technology Technical Coordinating Committee.

The committee’s function is to help develop a process to assess and validate appropriate sanitation technologies, get them certified and accredited, and guide their adoption and commercialisation.

However, while the regulator can make recommendations, it’s really the municipalities that make the decisions.

I believe that quality assurance through certification will provide users and water service authorities and municipalities with peace of mind that these technologies are safe and reliable.

While the cost of developing, testing and certifying non-sewered sanitation technologies may appear high now, it all boils down to the economics of scale.

Over time, a higher demand will make these systems cheaper to manufacture and affordable for households.

This article originally appeared on The Conversation and was republished with permission. Read the original article here.