‘His Majesty remains heir to the throne’ – Ramaphosa to appeal King Misuzulu ruling
The president is set to file a leave to appeal application with the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria.
![President Cyril Ramaphosa appeal / AmaZulu Zulu King](https://media.citizen.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/King-Misuzulu-kaZwelithini-recognition-President-Cyril-Ramaphosa-appeal-scaled.jpg)
King Misuzulu KaZwelithini during the national men’s day against GBVF in Durban on 22 July 2023. Picture: Gallo Images/Darren Stewart
President Cyril Ramaphosa will appeal a court ruling which set aside the certification of Misuzulu kaZwelithini as AmaZulu King, the Presidency has confirmed.
This week, the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria ruled that Ramaphosa’s decision to recognise King Misuzulu as the rightful heir to the throne, following the death of Zulu King Goodwill Zwelithini kaBhekuzulu in 2021, was unlawful and invalid.
Leave to appeal
While the court did not rule that the king should step aside, it ordered that Ramaphosa appoint a committee to investigate allegations of violation of customary laws in the identification of King Misuzulu.
Additionally, the Zulu King was ordered to pay the costs of his half-brother, Prince Simakade Zulu.
But Ramaphosa is set to challenge the court’s judgment.
ALSO READ: KZN government to increase budget for Zulu king’s comfort by R12 million
“Following a study of the judgment, the president will apply for leave to appeal against the judgment. During the course of these legal processes, His Majesty, King Misuzulu, remains the identified heir to the throne,” Presidency spokesperson Vincent Magwenya in a brief statement.
Magwenya said Ramaphosa had called on all members of the royal family to continue working for the “unity of the AmaZulu kingship and to prioritise the interests of King Misuzulu’s subjects”.
“It is vital that all due processes are allowed to reach their natural conclusion without inflaming tensions,” he added.
‘President’s recognition didn’t carry much weight’
Some people have criticised the ruling because it questioned the legitimacy of Zulu King’s ascension to the throne.
KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) political analyst Zakhele Ndlovu described the judgment as an insult to the Zulu nation and African culture.
“It should be remembered that the court is part of the western institutions which should not prescribe to Africans on how they should appoint their traditional leader. In terms of the Zulu culture a king is appointed in terms of Zulu traditions.
READ MORE: Buthelezi died of a ‘heartbreak’ because of his estranged relationship with Misuzulu – daughter
“While President Cyril Ramaphosa last year officially recognised the King as the legitimate heir to the throne, his recognition didn’t carry much weight in terms of Zulu traditions which stipulate that the king is recognised as the Zulu nation ruler upon entering the kraal — a ritual which was performed long before the president’s recognition of the current Zulu King,” he told The Witness on Tuesday.
Support for Misuzulu had been split among the royal household since even before his coronation.
A Zulu royal family faction led by the late king’s brother, Prince Mbonisi Zulu, objected to King Misuzulu kaZwelithini’s appointment, saying royal family members were not consulted before the decision to anoint the new king was made.
Some even declared Prince Simakade Zulu king before Misuzulu was coronated and the matter later went to court.
For more news your way
Download our app and read this and other great stories on the move. Available for Android and iOS.