Will soccer’s superstar sinners take to new bin sanction?
‘Sin bins’ have proved a success in tackling dissent on the pitch during trials in England, but whether it will work in the big leagues remains to be seen.
The referee shows the red card to Barcelona’s Uruguayan forward Luis Suarez (R) during the Spanish Copa del Rey (King’s Cup) semi final second leg football match FC Barcelona vs Club Atletico de Madrid at the Camp Nou stadium in Barcelona on February 7, 2017. / AFP PHOTO / LLUIS GENE
It is one of those intriguing thoughts that England’s Football Association would have decided to start the ball rolling on one of the most significant changes yet contemplated to world soccer among the rough and tumble, fish and chips leagues.
From 2019-20, temporary dismissals – the sin bin which has proved so effective in rugby – will become a permanent feature of the grassroots landscape for all leagues at Step 7 and below in the men’s game as well as Tier 5 and below of the women’s pyramid after limited trials last season.
It is a system – flawed though it might well be, by the human factor – which many would suggest is long overdue; an escape valve for the beleaguered match officials to firmly re-establish some control over a game where discipline is rapidly spiralling out of control.
The limited trials thus far have met the approval of Mark Ives, the FA’s head of judicial services, who is quoted as saying: “I am delighted with the overall response towards last season’s trial of temporary dismissals. While the general fall in dissent across the leagues involved has been fantastic to see, it is the collective sentiment towards the scheme and desire to continue with it that have been particularly encouraging.”
And he backs this up.
“‘Sin bins’ have so far proved a success in tackling dissent on the pitch. The nationwide trials that took place in both the men’s and women’s game throughout the 2017-18 season demonstrated the following: 25 leagues showed an overall reduction in dissent, 38% reduction in dissent across all leagues, 72% of players wanted to continue with the scheme, 77% of managers and/or coaches wanted to continue with the scheme and 84% of referees wanted to continue with the scheme.”
On the face of it, these are impressive gains. But you still have to take into account a very relevant pointer. Strong and on-the-second sanctions are a lot easier to impose on players in conditions of an organised kickabout on a ground probably granted them by the local authorities.
Getting this to filter upwards to the strata of overpaid superstardom on the manicured multimillion stadia is a different thing entirely. There is just too much money and too many hyped-up egos among the managements and the players to make this a viable possibility for now.
Jon Swift.
For more news your way, download The Citizen’s app for iOS and Android.
For more news your way
Download our app and read this and other great stories on the move. Available for Android and iOS.
