Single, in a committed relationship
The hospital forms gave me high blood pressure, because supposedly not being married means you're single.
Image courtesy stock.xchnge
Of late, I had to fill in a form for a hospital procedure. Hold the flowers, step away from the grapes, for it’s nothing serious – just a small “lady” procedure, and otherwise I am perfectly healthy. Or was, until the hospital forms gave me high blood pressure.
I began to fill them in, block capitals, blah-di-blah, all the usual stuff about emergency contacts, health insurance, allergies and so forth.
Then I got to a thorny question. Please tick appropriate box, it said. Marital Status: Single; Married; Widowed; Separated; Divorced.
Now, I have never been married, so I cannot technically be widowed, separated or divorced either.
Therefore, by default, I can only be … single? Of course, this may prove upsetting for Himself, who has stood beside me for 15 years. But still: single! Me! Oh, toss me my wine and my sexy knickers. Break out the Tinder; bring me another lover. We’ll just pop my fella in a cupboard and get on with this single lady malarkey, for the fact of us living together, having a home together, raising two children together, going on holiday together, fighting, loving, shouting, laughing, sleeping, and walking our three dogs together, cannot possibly count for anything.
A decade and a half of coupledom means nothing, because bureaucracy insists I must be single, simply because I have chosen not to get married.
Bureaucracy does not accept “partners” or “boyfriends.” Bureaucracy wants little bits of rubber-stamped paper, in triplicate, as proof of commitment.
Bureaucracy is a sanctimonious, judgmental jerk. So what did I do?. I crossed the whole sentence out. Then I wrote, in capitals: LONGTERM-PARTNER!. Underneath, for emphasis, I put in brackets: (15 years!) (2 children!) (This hardly qualifies as single!).
However, this being bureaucracy, there was yet another form questioning my marital status in its imperious way, as if only a deserving woman could undergo a gynaecological procedure.
Again, it offered as the two options “single” or broadly “was once/is still married”.
So I wrote “None of the above” and “in a committed relationship” and I underlined it too, because vociferous underlining denotes serious intent, right?
ALSO READ:
//
For more news your way, follow The Citizen on Facebook and Twitter.
For more news your way
Download our app and read this and other great stories on the move. Available for Android and iOS.