President’s power needs to be curbed

Bantu Holomisa, leader of the United Democratic Front, is one of the wise men of South African politics and he has seen the country changed dramatically.

His experience gives him a valuable vantage point when it comes to making sense of the crazy political world in which we find ourselves.

So, when he said this week that the powers of the president should be curbed, the country should have sat up and listened.

Holomisa made an astute observation that curtailing these powers was necessary because, when our constitution was originally crafted in the Mandela era, nobody could foresee that there would be a “rogue” politician in the top job.

Presidential candidates Lindiwe Sisulu and Mathews Phosa also weighed in on the discussion.

Phosa remarked that the changes needed to be made immediately, to stop President Jacob Zuma from abusing his powers. Of primary concern to them and many in the ANC is the fact that Zuma is exhibiting dictatorial tendencies.

He overturned a decision that the ANC’s KwaZuluNatal executive be replaced, despite a court finding that it was elected illegally; he has sat on the announcement of the board members of the SABC; and has delayed various attempts to investigate claims of state capture.

Another major concern is that the president decides who gets appointed as a minister, as well as having a lot of influence in the appointment of directors-general.

This means he has been able to implement a vast and effective system of patronage which has enabled him and his cronies, the Guptas, to benefit from state resources.

His foot soldiers have proved themselves willing to do almost anything to defend him. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. That is why the powers of the next president – whoever he or she may be – should be cut back.