Painfully slow death of IS

US Army Colonel John L Dorrian, spokesperson of Combined Joint Task Force – Operation Inherent Resolve (CJTF/OIR), said: “Unfortunately, it is unrealistic to expect zero civilian casualties in armed conflict.”

The CJTF/OIR is the US-led international force that was created to defeat Islamic State (IS), but Dorrian was talking in particular about the city of Mosul in northern Iraq, captured by the forces of IS more than two years ago.

There are still at least 650 000 civilians in the IS-controlled part of Mosul and when the Iraqi army retakes it, a lot of them will be killed or injured.

Dorrian was just trying to manage expectations, as they say, but he needn’t have worried. As many civilians will probably be killed during the reconquest of Mosul as died in the Syrian army’s reconquest of eastern Aleppo in December, but it won’t get as much media attention – mainly because IS is not as subtle as the Nusra Front, the rival Islamist organisation that dominated eastern Aleppo.

The Nusra Front, now rebranded as Jabhat Fatah al-Sham (Conquest of Syria Front) to disguise its allegiance to Al-Qaeda, was clever enough to let little girls blog about the horrors of the siege of Aleppo – and the Western media obligingly ran it all without question.

It was a holocaust, they reported, committed by the evil army of that wicked Bashar al-Assad. Western media won’t be saying that sort of thing about the inevitable deaths of innocent civilians during the retaking of Mosul, because the West supports the Iraqi army.

The Iraqi army’s attempt to take Mosul back from IS has already lasted almost as long as the siege of Stalingrad. So far, it has only managed to clear the suburbs on the east bank of the Tigris river and civilian deaths have only been in the hundreds.

Last week, it began its assault on the main part of the city, which lies on the west bank. It may fight its way in to the core of the old city in another month or two. The casualties will be high among soldiers and civilians and it is unlikely the operation will end until April or May.

Let’s be optimistic and assume Mosul will ultimately fall. That would put an end to the Iraqi half of what used to be called Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS), but what happens to the Syrian part of IS is still very much up in the air. It was losing territory to the Syrian Kurds, whose army was advancing steadily on the IS capital at Raqqa in eastern Syria.

The Syrian Kurds have done so well because they had US air support on call at all times. Indeed, the Kurds were America’s main ally in the Syrian civil war, and the only major ground force (apart from the Syrian army) that was actively fighting IS. But now all that is at risk because Turkey, which has been the main support of the Syrian rebels for years, has switched sides.

It sees a semi-independent Kurdish state in northern Syria as a bigger threat to its territorial integrity than either IS or the Assad regime in Damascus. And it appears to have made a deal with Russia that will give it a free hand to destroy the Syrian Kurds.

The Kurds are used to being betrayed, so they won’t even be surprised. But it does mean that destroying IS in Syria will have to wait for a while.

Gwynne Dyer

For more news your way, follow The Citizen on Facebook and Twitter.