Avatar photo

By Gwynne Dyer

Author, columnist, documentary film maker and lecture


Climate crisis escalates: 2024 expected to be hotter than 2023

Two views of the climate change scenario – but which expert can we believe?


This year has probably been the hottest in the past 10 000 years – but everybody agrees 2024 will be even hotter.

That’s because we are now entering El Niño, the part of a seven-yearly oceanic cycle that heaps extra heat on.

El Niño is not part of climate change, but in 2024, it will get piled on top of a lot of climate warming that has happened over the past seven years, so it’s certain to break all previous records. The question is by how much? Jim Hansen says by a lot.

“The 1.50C limit is deader than a doornail,” Hansen told me, “and the scenarios you would need to stay under 20Cs are just imaginary.”

ALSO READ: Cop28’s $700m pledge a drop in the ocean amid global climate crisis

“No more than 1.5°C” was the limit we were told to aim for to avoid big jumps in the average global temperature. “Never more than 2°C” was the absolute limit, because after that “runaway” would become likely. Both gone, he says.

The world crossed the threshold into +1.2°C about two years ago, and the general assumption was that we would stay in that zone for at least the next five years. But 2023 ended up at around +1.4°C, with huge wildfires, massive floods and storms, killer heat waves – and Hansen says 2024, with the El Niño boost, will be much worse.

“Within the next year or two (2024-25) we will go up to 1.6°C, 1.7°C warming. Then after the El Niño finishes, it will drop back – but it’s not going to drop all the way back to 1.2°C.

“It may go down to 1.4°C, but because the planet is so far out of equilibrium it’s not going to drop much. So we’re already at sort of the 1.5°C warming limit, and we’ve got plus two degrees C in the pipeline to 2030s is my estimate.”

ALSO READ: Coal use to decline next year after record high in 2023 – IEA

Hansen has the tickets to make these claims because he has been a climate scientist all of his long life (he’s 82), and he has the distinction of being the man who went to the US Congress in 1988, and persuaded them to take the new threat of climate change seriously. Saturday 10 30 December 2023.

It didn’t last, but that’s not his fault.

The man leading the charge against Hansen is Michael Mann, a scientist of comparable stature who had a significant role in creating the current consensus. (That is, the consensus that says we still have a chance of staying below +1.5°C until 2035.)

Mann responded to Hansen’s paper within a few days of its publication in November. After a few ritual expressions of respect for Hansen’s record, he got down to business: “This latest contribution from Jim and his co-authors is at best unconvincing,” said Mann. (What would “at worst” be, then?)

ALSO READ: Do what you can to avoid COP28 fatigue

“I don’t think they have made the case for their main claims, ie. that warming is accelerating, that the planetary heat imbalance is increasing, that aerosols are playing some outsized role, or that climate models are getting all of this wrong

“And I certainly don’t think that they’ve made the case for engaging in potentially disastrous planetary-scale geoengineering projects.”

That last is a reference to Hansen’s conclusion that the situation is so dire and so urgent that we need “geo-engineering” measures to hold the heat down almost immediately.

These are two climate scientists of high reputation and long experience having an argument that concerns the fate of high-tech human civilisation on this planet. Neither is very optimistic about our ability to deal with the climate threat: even Mann, dismissing Hansen’s arguments, says: “It’s bad enough already.”

ALSO READ: With 80,000 attendees, COP28 is largest UN climate summit ever

But how are we lesser beings to choose between their arguments? Hansen has been kind enough to give us a tool. He has predicted that there will be a big jump in the average global temperature (up to half a degree more than El Niño would account for) by this April or May.

It wouldn’t prove or disprove his entire thesis, but what happens by May would substantiate or invalidate one important part of it. Wait for spring, and see what happens.

Read more on these topics

climate climate change environment

For more news your way

Download our app and read this and other great stories on the move. Available for Android and iOS.