MDC loses bid to overturn Zim election results

MDC Alliance leader Nelson Chamisa. Picture: ZINYANGE AUNTONY/AFP

MDC Alliance leader Nelson Chamisa. Picture: ZINYANGE AUNTONY/AFP

Zimbabwe’s top judge ruled that the opposition party did not do enough to prove that the elections were rigged.  

Zanu-PF supporters in court celebrated as Zimbabwean chief justice Luke Malaba dismissed the MDC’s petition at the country’s Constitutional Court on Friday afternoon, which sought to challenge the results of the country’s recent elections.

Malaba found that the MDC Alliance failed to put forward credible evidence of irregularities.

According to Malaba, the opposition alliance’s presidential candidate Nelson Chamisa and the MDC didn’t show any primary evidence of vote-rigging by the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission (ZEC).

Malaba said the burden of proof regarding electoral misconduct was on the MDC, and that they did not do enough to prove that the elections were rigged.

Zimbabwe’s top judge also said the MDC Alliance made unsubstantiated allegations that the ballots were tampered with. He added that Chamisa failed to ask for a recount or to reopen ballot boxes at the time of the elections.

He also said that the ZEC counting errors submitted as evidence by the MDC had no bearing on the election results.

Lawyers for the opposition argued that the results should be annulled due to “massive doctoring” of the July 30 vote.

“There is a massive cover-up. There has been a massive doctoring of evidence,” Thabani Mpofu, representing the MDC, told the court on Wednesday.

Mnangagwa, of the ruling Zanu-PF party, won the election with 50.8% of the vote — just enough to meet the 50% threshold needed to avoid a run-off against MDC leader Nelson Chamisa, who scored 44.3%.

Thembinkosi Magwaliba, representing Mnangagwa, dismissed claims that the opposition had produced any evidence of fraud.

“This application was not seriously done. The applicant is clearly flippant,” he said.

But in a first for the country, the proceedings have been broadcast live on state television.

Mnangagwa, who has vowed to revive Zimbabwe’s ruined economy, had hoped the elections would draw a line under Mugabe’s repressive 37-year rule and open up a stream of foreign investment and aid.

Campaigning was more open than in previous votes, but the election was marred by the army opening fire on protesters, killing six, allegations of vote-rigging and a crackdown on opposition activists.

The MDC has cited a catalogue of discrepancies including incorrect counting, fake “ghost” polling stations, and at some polling stations more ballots being counted than there were registered voters.

Derek Matyszak, a legal expert at the University of Zimbabwe, said the opposition faced an uphill struggle given the courts’ historic tilt towards Zanu-PF, which has ruled since independence from British colonial rule in 1980.

“The outcome is pretty predictable,” Matyszak told AFP.

The MDC’s appeal, which was lodged hours before the deadline on August 10, has already forced Mnangagwa’s inauguration — planned for August 12 — to be postponed.

International monitors largely praised the conduct of the election itself, although EU observers said that Mnangagwa, a former long-time Mugabe ally, benefited from an “un-level playing field”.

The court could declare a winner, call another election, or order a run-off or recount. The inauguration should take place within 48 hours of the court’s ruling, according to the constitution.

For more news your way, download The Citizen’s app for iOS and Android.

today in print