Chantal Revell warns of the consequences for the country of a parliament that undermines the Constitutional Court by failing to implement its order to amend the Electoral Act. Image: Moneyweb
Speaker of parliament Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula has been dealt another blow in her application to further extend the deadline set by the Constitutional Court for amending the Electoral Act, which was found to be unconstitutional more than two years ago.
This after Princess Chantal Revell of the Koranna royal household – one of the five official royal priesthoods of the Khoi and San first nations – threw her weight behind the New Nation Movement in its opposition to any further extension and quest for strict oversight over the politicians who are seemingly unwilling to relinquish power.
The Electoral Commission of SA (IEC) has hardly any time left to accommodate the changes proposed in the current amendment Bill before the 2024 provincial and national elections, let alone any further changes that may be made.
The Constitutional Court in June 2020 declared the Electoral Act unconstitutional in that it does not allow candidates to participate in provincial and national elections unless they represent political parties.
Revell is the only applicant who wants to personally exercise her right to stand as a candidate outside of any political party affiliation; the others, including New Nation, being organisations representing civil society.
The court initially suspended its order of unconstitutionality for two years to give parliament an opportunity to amend the act and rectify the shortcomings.
With the deadline looming, it was clear the amendments would not be made in time and despite objections by Revell and New Nation, the court gave an extension until the end of last year.
With only days to go, Mapisa-Nqakula, together with National Council of Provinces chair Amos Masondo and Home Affairs Minister Dr Aaron Motsoaledi, approached the court for another extension to the end of February.
New Nation and Revell opposed this application and New Nation brought a counter application to be allowed to present arguments to show the court that the proposed amendments parliament has come up with are still not in line with the constitution.
Alternatively, they asked the court to compel parliament to report back on the progress it is making every two weeks.
NOW READ: ConCourt grants Parliament six-month extension to amend Electoral Act
The court then extended the deadline until 31 January to be able to hear arguments from all parties.
Failure to give a further extension would have given rise to a constitutional crisis, as SA would have been left without a valid Electoral Act and, therefore, no way to conduct lawful elections or by-elections, except at municipal level.
Revell has now indicated that she supported New Nation’s counter application. In her affidavit she states that two and a half years after the court acknowledged her right to represent her people in parliament, she still has no way to enforce this right.
This because of the failure of parliament to execute what the court has ordered it to do. In fact, four years and one election have passed since the application was first brought in 2018.
Revell says despite her being a leader of the Khoi people, she feels as if she is not being seen or heard “and that me and my people [are] nothing”.
“Since colonialism, our people continue to live in abject poverty, as if our lives don’t matter. And this, despite the fact that we can rightfully claim to be descendants of the first people of our country and that I am one of its recognised leaders.”
Revell accuses parliament of dragging its feet and says there is no valid reason for a further extension. She further questions whether parliament will get the amendment finalised by the 28 February deadline it proposed to court.
Revell suggests parliament relies on the importance of the matter and the dire consequences if its application for the further extension is refused. She argues the consequences for SA of a parliament that undermines the Constitutional Court by failing to implement its order are even worse.
What’s behind the dragging of feet?
Political commentators have pointed out the proposed amendment will decrease the number of seats available for representatives of political parties in parliament and provincial legislators, thus diluting the power of these parties.
There is, therefore, little incentive for them to finalise the amendment and this is probably the reason for the slow progress.
The delay may make it impossible for the IEC to incorporate the new rules in its preparations for the 2024 elections. The IEC told the court in December it had already started with preparations based on the amendments currently before parliament.
Chief electoral officer Sy Mamabolo said in an affidavit that if the IEC has to wait any longer to start preparing, it will not be able to deliver a free and fair election.
ALSO READ: Electoral Act changes must pass urgently to avoid constitutional crisis before 2024 polls
This article first appeared on Moneyweb and was republished with permission. Read the original article here.
Download our app and read this and other great stories on the move. Available for Android and iOS.
