2 minute read
13 Mar 2014
11:29 am

Forensics squeezed at Pistorius Trial

Oscar Pistorius's lawyer seized on a State forensic analyst's apparent omissions in collecting evidence for the paralympian's murder trial in the High Court in Pretoria.

Oscar Pistorius sits in the dock during his murder trial at the North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria, Thursday, 13 March 2014. The Paralympian pleaded not guilty to murder, although he admits killing Reeva Steenkamp by shooting her through a locked bathroom door. He mistook her for a burglar in his house, saying he made a tragic but understandable mistake. The murder trial has been compared to that of the OJ Simpson case in the United States 20 years ago. Picture: Alet Pretorius/Pool

Barry Roux, SC, wanted to know on Thursday why Colonel Johannes Vermeulen had not analysed a prosthetic foot of the double amputee which was handed in as evidence.

The significance of the prosthetic foot and door became evident on Wednesday when Vermeulen was asked to testify on the cricket bat Pistorius said he used to break the toilet door down, after he shot his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp on February 14 2013.

Vermeulen had said that in his opinion Pistorius was on his stumps when he bashed the cricket bat into the door, based on height measurements of marks on the door, even though he had left this out of his report.

Pistorius said at his bail hearing that he was on his stumps when he fired four shots into the door, then when he realised it was Steenkamp, he put his “legs” on and struck at the door with a cricket bat.

Roux also wanted to know why Vermeulen had not analysed a section of the door which had a mark which could corroborate Pistorius’s version that he had his prosthetic legs on and kicked the door down to free Steenkamp.

He also wanted to know why Vermeulen only examined the shin of the prosthetic leg, and not the foot.

“I was not requested to do analysis on the prosthetic foot, except for that mark that was on the shin,” said Vermeulen.

He reiterated Wednesday’s testimony that he had only been asked to focus on analysing the cricket bat and the strike marks from the bat on the door.

He denied reading the contents of Pistorius’s bail application, saying he had only seen a part of it when he walked past it when it was open on the desk.

He repeated his opinion that it was possible that the mark on the door, which looks like a shoe print, could be from a kick, but unless analysis was done there was no certainty. Pistorius could also have stood on a broken piece of door later.

Roux said it would be demonstrated that Pistorius can kick high.

He said that although Vermeulen claimed to work for both the accused and the State, he had already said he did “not bother” to check for anything unrelated to the cricket bat.

“I ignored those that I could immediately link with the cricket bat because I know there were various other investigations going on and different issues with the door,” he said.

Pistorius has been charged with the murder of Steenkamp in his home in Silver Woods estate, Pretoria, as well as charges under the Firearms Act relating to the alleged discharge of a firearm at Tasha’s restaurant, Johannesburg, and out the sunroof of a car driving back from the Vaal River.

He has pleaded not guilty to all charges.