Positive foreign direct investment trends emerge despite mining sector concerns

Last week BHP made a bid for Anglo American minus the SA assets, confirming the widely held perception that SA mining is uninvestible due to bureaucratic ineptitude in the issuing of mining licences, onerous BEE requirements and the disasters at Eskom and logistics provider Transnet.

No mining house worth its salt wants to step into this mess, or so the terms of the BHP bid seem to suggest: we want everything Anglo has to offer, just not in SA.

Mining sector

That accords with Stanlib data showing that a net R1 trillion has been pulled from SA financial markets by foreigners in the past 10 years for a laundry list of reasons: corruption, decrepit state-owned companies, a deteriorating fiscal position and multiple downgrades, to name the most obvious.

ALSO READ: Mining did well in February, but manufacturing slipped

It’s a different story with foreign direct investment (FDI) which, unlike fickle financial markets flows, is by nature long-term and ploughed into productive capacity.

The same week BHP threw its hat in the Anglo ring, PwC published a report showing that SA has attracted net positive FDI every year since 2018.

It turns out that mining accounted for nearly a quarter (24.2%) of the country’s inward investment stock, worth nearly R3 trillion in 2022.

That seems to contradict the notion that the SA mining sector is uninvestible, though it is clear that the major mining houses are steering well clear on SA.

ALSO READ: Manufacturing did better than mining in January

Manufacturing is by far the largest holder of FDI at 38.5% of the inward stock, followed by mining and financial services (20%).

Inflows top outflows

South Africa has seen a net FDI inflow (inflows minus outflows) every year since 2018, says PwC’s April Economic Outlook bulletin.

“This may come as a surprise to some considering the country’s economic challenges and obstacles faced by private business. Many would expect that outflows would overshadow inflows. However, data from the South African Reserve Bank (Sarb) shows that the country’s net FDI flows averaged R58 billion per annum after the global financial crisis when excluding 2021.”

ALSO READ: Mining output positive in fourth quarter despite sharp fall in December

That year was an outlier due to Covid, and included deals that were postponed in 2020 as well as transactions from companies that were forced to make strategic deals to keep their doors open.

In fact, 2021 was a huge year for inflows, totalling a net R594 billion or 9.5% of GDP, which contributed to SA’s ability to bounce back from the devastation of Covid.

FDI flows to SA (R billions)

In 2023, SA recorded net FDI inflows of R91.3 billion or 1.3% of GDP.

PwC senior economist Christie Viljoen says it’s not surprising that manufacturing attracts the lion’s share of FDI inflows, given its prominence in sectors such as vehicle manufacture, food products and building materials.

Mining investment

“Mining investment is also surprisingly robust, but perhaps we shouldn’t be too surprised given the fact that it has a 170 year track record in this country and we are the world’s largest exporters of platinum group metals, as well as major global suppliers of iron ore, coal, chrome and other crucial minerals and metals.”

ALSO READ: Mining production lowers odds of recession, manufacturing remains weak

It’s also no surprise that financial services is the third largest recipient of FDI flows, given the presence of several large banking and insurance groups, with representation across the continent and further afield.

“The financial services sector in SA is sophisticated and well developed and has shown relatively strong growth in recent years, which would make it attractive for foreign investors,” says Viljoen.

Perceptions of SA rosier abroad

South Africans have a generally negative view of public governance and service delivery, but the country does better than many think on objective measures such as the World Bank’s Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGIs), which measures six factors, such as regulatory quality, rule of law, control of corruption and government effectiveness for more than 200 countries. SA ranks about midway in the WGI ranking.

Because South Africans have witnessed a decline in the quality of public services, many assume the country underperforms its peers. This is a narrow view.

Being a middle-of-the-pack performance rather than something more dismal accounts to a large extent for the moderately positive view of the country’s governance held by foreign investors.

Unlike portfolio flows, these FDI flows have a huge impact on the economy. PwC calculates that a hypothetical R3.4 billion greenfields investment in the auto sector would add R4.5 billion to GDP, create 12 600 jobs in the construction phase and contribute R876 million to the fiscus.

The positives for SA

PwC says the positives for SA include:

• World-class financial services and communication industries;
• A deep capital market;
• Quality tertiary institutions producing graduates with internationally-comparable qualifications;
• Abundant natural resources (including renewables);
• A strategic geographical location for entry into the rest of sub-Saharan Africa; and
• A transparent legal system, and a certain degree of political and policy stability.

“On the international stage, these positive attributes contribute to continued interest in South Africa as an investment destination,” adds PwC.

SA also features roughly midway (66^th) out of 125 countries measured by the Venture Capital & Private Equity Country Attractiveness Index, placing it alongside Malta, Croatia and Slovakia.

To attract FDI interest, PwC says SA companies need to show:

• A track record of commercial sustainability across the systemic crises the country has experienced;
• That they are well positioned to maintain their performance into the future; and
• They have capabilities that can be exported to other territories.

This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here