Which of SA’s five largest metros is the most expensive to live in?
On water tariffs alone, Johannesburg is generally the cheapest and eThekwini the priciest.
Property rates in Durban are as much as double those charged by the City of Johannesburg, while Cape Town’s are the lowest across the major metros. Photo: iStock
Recent analyses on Moneyweb showed the stark divergence in different municipal charges across the country’s five largest metros – Johannesburg, Tshwane, Ekurhuleni, eThekwini (Durban), and Cape Town.
Property rates in Durban are as much as double those charged by the City of Johannesburg, while Cape Town’s are the lowest across the major metros.
Cape Town’s flat rate for refuse removal is also the lowest across the metros, with Joburg’s method of charging based on municipal valuation meaning it is easily the most expensive once a property’s value exceeds R1.5 million.
Water tariffs are complex as these need to be looked at together with the charges for sanitation (waste water removal). With the exception of Joburg, which charges based on property size, the metros charge for sanitation based on the amount of water consumed (as much of this becomes wastewater).
On water tariffs alone, Johannesburg is generally the cheapest and eThekwini the priciest.
At a low level of usage – 10 kilolitres (kl) per month – Durban’s prices are more than 150% higher than the City of Joburg’s (Joburg households receive 6kl of free water each month). Even at a high level of usage (30kl) its prices are 15% higher than Joburg’s. But when factoring in sanitation tariffs, Tshwane’s charges are the lowest and Cape Town’s the steepest.
Electricity prices are more complex, as different metros have different tariff plans for different households. Additionally, certain Joburg areas (primarily greater Sandton and Soweto) are supplied directly by Eskom.
To compare municipal charges across the metros more accurately, all these charges need to be looked at together.
This would be the actual experience of households.
Moneyweb has constructed two scenarios for comparison:
- A middle class ‘entry-level’ townhouse property valued at R1 million, using 15kl of water a month and 600 kilowatt hours (kWh) of electricity; and
- A ‘mid-level’ property, likely also a townhouse, for a small middle-class family valued at R2 million using 25kl of water a month and 1 000kWh of electricity
If anything, the electricity figures are rather generous given that Eskom says the “average household” in the country uses 900kWh (because of skyrocketing electricity prices, many homes have made the shift to gas stoves and have had geyser timers installed).
The singular exception is Cape Town where property prices are structurally higher than the other metros, as some readers rightfully pointed out.
For example, it is practically impossible to find an apartment for R1 million in the city (aside from one of those absurd sub-30m2 micro apartments, which is not a fair comparison).
We have therefore adjusted the value of the ‘entry-level’ property in the Cape to R2 million, and the mid-level property to R4 million in order to get a more accurate reflection of rates.
* Assuming a townhouse (where the minimum charge is R474.15)
** For rates in Cape Town, a R2 million property is used
On the ‘entry-level’ house, total monthly charges range between R2 751 and R3 499 – this equates to a 27% difference between lowest and highest priced.
The steep monthly fixed charges levied by City Power in Joburg for postpaid electricity customers – a network charge and capacity charge – total R825 (excluding Vat) and mean that these households would typically pay the most among the metros for the same basket of services.
By comparison, City Power customers using prepaid would effectively be paying among the lowest out of the five metros.
The two different electricity tariffs in Ekurhuleni (regardless of postpaid or prepaid) result in very different outcomes.
Cape Town tariffs are expensive when a more realistic comparison is made (use a R1 million property and the total drops to around R2 900, but this is not reflective of the real-world experience).
* Assuming a townhouse (where the minimum charge is R474.15) or a stand size of 301m2 to 1 000m2
** For rates in Cape Town, a R4 million property is used
For the mid-level scenario, Ekurhuleni and Cape Town are the priciest.
Again, one can quibble about the Cape Town rates adjustment, but a R2 million townhouse in the north-western suburbs of Joburg will be significantly larger than a R2 million one in the northern suburbs of Cape Town (both areas require a long commute to business hubs).
There is a distortion where Ekurhuleni customers on electricity Tariff A pay significantly more, due to this tariff specifically penalising usage above 700kWh per month – anything above that is charged at R7.60 per kWh (excluding Vat) versus the R2.50 to R3.50 range elsewhere.
It is unlikely that many households that consume higher volumes of power will be (or still be) on this tariff.
Joburg City Power’s fixed charges make less of an impact at these levels of usage. But the city’s lower rates and flat-rated sewerage charges mean its households pay the least among major metros for the same municipal services.
The difference between Joburg City Power prepaid customers (who pay the lowest) and Cape Town is 27%.
Exclude Cape Town and there remains a difference of 18% between a R2 million prepaid household in Joburg and one in Ekurhuleni.
For more news your way
Download our app and read this and other great stories on the move. Available for Android and iOS.