CrimeEditor's choiceNews

Sexual predator found guilty

'His testimony carries very little weight.'

Judgement was delivered yesterday, 22 November in the case of the teen predator who approached school girls and offered them money in exchange for oral sex.

The accused, Claude Marais, whose name can now be published because he was found guilty on five of the eight charges against him, faced Regional Magistrate Delize Smith while she delivered judgement.

Read more here: Alleged sexual offender’s alibi tested

Smith said the modi operandi pertaining to the first four charges were very similar. According to the statements by the victims, a white male sat in a white car close to a stop street in broad daylight while the learners were on their way home from school. The car window was rolled down and he made sexual advances towards the girls.

“The first victim could clearly identify Marais,” Smith said. “According to her statement, his exposed penis was erect. He offered her R300 to perform oral sex on him. When she ran away, he sped off.”

Smith said the then 17-year-old girl was a reliable witness and the court accepted her testimony. “She could give a clear description of his hair and that he was exposed from the waist down. She identified him as the accused.”

The second and third victims’ testimonies were also accepted by the court because of being chronologically sound. Although the third victim did not attend an identity parade, she managed to positively identify Marais later in court as the person who had made sexual advances towards her.

Also Read: Six deadly sins in the way of safer neighbourhoods

The fourth victim’s evidence was not sufficient to identify Marais because, although she gave a clear description of his features, she pointed out someone else during the identity parade. However, the court accepted the car registration number she provided.

The fifth victim, whom he approached one morning, was a primary school learner. The court ruled that the girl had contradicted herself when giving evidence, therefore Marais was found not guilty.

Smith pointed out that Marais denied being at the scenes where the crimes were committed, and that he claimed that he would be able to prove it. However, he did not immediately submit his laptop as evidence, therefore the court accepted evidence to the contrary. She said his cellphone records also contradicted his testimony as it showed that he was in the area.

“The court cannot accept the accused’s version that he was at his office the whole day since his cellphone records tell a different story,” Smith said.

“Since the laptop and desktop computers were not examined by the state, it can be argued that they were manipulated. [Marais is an IT specialist.] His testimony carries very little weight,” she said.

Smith said it was too much of a coincidence that in four of the victims’ testimonies the details about the assaults were almost identical and there was no evidence that they could have obtained the information from another source.

Sentencing will take place on 7 February next year.

Do you perhaps have more information pertaining to this story? Email us at roodepoortrecord@caxton.co.za (remember to include your contact details) or phone us on 011 955 1130.

For free daily local news on the West Rand, also visit our sister newspaper websites 

Randfontein Herald

Krugersdorp News 

Get It Joburg West Magazine

Remember to visit our Facebook, Twitter and Instagram pages to let your voice be heard!

 

Related Articles

81 Comments

  1. Pingback: urgent essay help
  2. Pingback: generic for viagra
  3. Pingback: Cardizem
  4. Pingback: viagra
  5. Pingback: buy an essay paper
  6. Pingback: cost of tadalafil
  7. Pingback: cost cialis
  8. Pingback: walgreen prilosec
  9. Pingback: does lexapro work
  10. Pingback: cialis results
  11. Pingback: Anonymous
  12. Pingback: Anonymous
  13. Pingback: Anonymous
  14. Pingback: flccc ivermectin
  15. Pingback: ivermectin uk
  16. Pingback: tadalafil liquid
  17. Pingback: tadalafil buy
  18. Pingback: viagra sale ottawa
  19. Pingback: tadalafil
  20. Pingback: cialis price
  21. Pingback: cialis dosage
  22. Pingback: cheap cialis india
  23. Pingback: cialis pill
  24. Pingback: generic cialis
  25. Pingback: buy cialis online
  26. Pingback: cheap cialis india
  27. Pingback: ivermectin powder
  28. Pingback: ivermectin 0.1
  29. Pingback: ivermectin otc
  30. Pingback: merck ivermectin
  31. Pingback: ivermectin amazon
  32. Pingback: ivermectin dosing
Back to top button