Springbok coach shrugs off World Cup spying fears

Jacques Nienaber questions why teams would need to spy on each other if they can determine their opponents' way of playing through analysis of previous matches.

Jacques Nienaber shrugged off fears that rugby espionage was at play at the Rugby World Cup, with some teams worried they were being spied on.

The France-based World Cup is expected to be one of the most competitive in the tournament’s history, with defending champions South Africa, world number one Ireland, New Zealand, Australia, Argentina, England, Scotland and the tournament hosts all realistic challengers for the Webb Ellis Cup.

According to a report by The Telegrapha ‘leading nation’ has approached World Rugby to clarify the sanctions for any team that is caught illegally observing another’s training.

This is not the first time that concerns about spying have been raised at a World Cup.

Eddie Jones, in his previous role as England head coach, claimed that England were spied on while preparing for the 2019 World Cup semi-final clash against New Zealand.

Speaking ahead of their World Cup opener against Scotland, Nienaber said there were no fears of the Bok playbook falling into the wrong hands.

“If I asked you guys [the media] if you think we’re going to use the maul on Saturday you probably will agree that we will,” said Nienaber.

“And did you spy on us? No, it’s just because you know us.

“So, I don’t understand the spying thing at all. Through proper analysis you’ve got a pretty good idea what’s coming your way.”

Nienaber said he didn’t understand the need to raise concerns that filming of training sessions was a risk

“I’m just going to use Scotland as an example, because myself and Rassie [Erasmus] have coached against Gregor [Townsend, Scotland coach] since 2016 when he was at Glasgow, and we were at Munster.

“We drew them in Europe as well, so we played them four times in one year! So obviously coaching against Gregor, and the style of coaching that he uses and the style of play that he uses, we’ve known pretty much from 2016. You pretty much get used to what to expect.

“I think with proper analysis you’ve got an incredibly good idea of what you’re going to face on a Saturday. Yes, there might be a five to ten percent change or something new that you bring in, but I don’t understand the spying thing.”

Nienaber pointed out that if South Africa believed in the value of secrecy the team would not be named earlier than any other nation in the world – two days before the required deadline.

“I think we’re as transparent as we can be from our perspective,” he said.

“I mean, we announce our team very early in the week, so we get it out the way. We would probably like to announce it on a Monday if we could but unfortunately my personal work programme on a Monday from a rugby perspective is just too busy.

“It just suits us better from an administrative point of view to announce our team then. And then I think if you look at Chasing the Sun [documentary of the last Rugby World Cup] I don’t think there’s people who wouldn’t know how we operate within the Springbok environment.

“Locally we had the Inside the Boks behind the scenes documentary where we go into depth on how we manage our players. I’m not saying other teams think like that, I’m just giving you my perception on it. I think with all the analysis technology that’s available these days and you do your work why would you need to do anything else?”

Read original story on www.sarugbymag.co.za

Jana Boshoff

Award-winning community news journalist with over a decade's newsroom experience. Passionate about hard-hitting news stories!
Back to top button