Today, South Africa’s highest court decriminalised both the use and cultivation of cannabis in private.
Deputy chief justice Raymond Zondo, more often found recently probing alleged state capture at the commission of inquiry he helms, delivered the unanimous judgement.
The court not only upheld but expanded on Dennis Davis’ landmark judgement last year that those using and growing cannabis in the privacy of their own home should be left in peace.
The ban on private possession, consumption and private cultivation of dagga at home was ruled unconstitutional.
While parliament has two years to adapt the law to reflect this, Justice Zondo explained that individuals are allowed to smoke privately in their own home in the meanwhile.
At the Western Cape high court, Davis found that the ban on weed-smoking at home violated individuals’ constitutional right to privacy.
The constitutional court has now ruled in agreement with Davis and against the state’s attempted to have his judgement reversed.
The Western Cape high court case was brought by lawyer, Rastafarian, and activist Gareth Prince, alongside Jeremy Acton, leader of South Africa’s ‘Dagga party’ Iqela Lentsango.
Myrtle Clarke and Jules Stobbs, better known as SA’s indomitable ‘Dagga Couple’, signed onto the case as applicants in the hopes of securing a judgement with further reaching implications than just the right to consume the plant privately at home.
Since 2013 Stobbs and Clarke have been arguing a separate case they have dubbed “The Trial of the Plant” in the Pretoria High Court that seeks to get all existing laws on the cultivation, use, and sales of the plant revoked and rewritten in parliament.
The two cases are connected, with the constitutional court asking why they should give judgement on Prince and Acton’s case before waiting for the outcome of The Dagga Couple’s one in Pretoria.
“Our argument is that it would unnecessarily prejudice this case for its outcome to be dependent on our separate high court case,” Stobbs told The Citizen.
Stobbs, who alongside Clarke had flown back to Johannesburg especially to hear the judgement, said: “It’s a massive day for us. We’ve got sweaty palms and dry mouths. We’ve been waiting with bated breath for this baby for nine months.”
The pair expressed optimism before going in: “We fully expect the ConCourt to be on our side, we just don’t know to what degree.
“One of three things could happen.
“They could tell us they’re not going to uphold the judgement, but if they were going to do that they would have taken nine weeks, not nine months.
“They could expand on the judgement, and rule comprehensively on the plant in a way that goes beyond the question of whether or not you should be able to legally use it in your own home.
Or they could say we haven’t got enough to go on and send us back to Pretoria.”
The third option would have presented a bit of a “catch 22” for the pair, who would have to raise the legal fees to allow them to continue fighting the Pretoria high court case.
“We’d love to be able to fully ventilate every aspect of the issue in Pretoria, but it would cost over a million rand to do it. We wouldn’t mind if money was no object,” said Stobbs.
“We joined as applicants so we could bring all the information we’d submitted in our other case and offer it to the ConCourt too, so they can hopefully come up with a comprehensive judgement, that takes into account the facts presented at both case,” he said.
Read original story on citizen.co.za
