Parkhill cell tower proposal raises health concerns
According to Atlas Towers the cellphone mast is needed in the area due to the evolving digital world.
PARKHILL residents are concerned about the value of their properties as Atlas Towers has proposed installing a telecommunications transmission tower in their area. The City has invited residents to comment on the proposed tower before a final decision can be taken.
Local resident Gina Klingbeil said the tower poses major health risks especially to her children.
“Sleeping with your phone in the room is a problem, but at least you can switch it off or move it to the next room. Now imagine this big tower running 24/7 for the rest of your life,” she said.
On the other hand Atlas Towers, the company responsible for the tower said they have adhered to all the applicable rules.
“We are dedicated to the development of quality telecommunication infrastructure. We firmly adhere to the applicable rules, regulations, and requirements that govern the proper sitting and operation of communication facilities in all municipalities. Our communication facilities are exponentially below both South Africa’s accepted EMF exposure limits and all international accepted standards,” said the company.
You may be interested in: First phase of billion rand Point Waterfront project launched
Klingbeil added that no amount of research can prove that the tower won’t affect their health.
“They can’t prove that it’s safe. I prefer to exercise my right to be cautious, especially for my children. I have submitted my letter opposing the tower and I urge other residents to do that as well,” she added.
Another resident, David Marshall said the tower will not only affect their health but will decrease the value of their properties.
“No one wants to buy property next to a tower. The likelihood of us being able to find buyers for our homes will be slim if the tower is erected,” said Marshall.
According to Atlas Towers the cellphone mast is needed in the area due to the evolving digital world. Residents are arguing that the company did not spend time educating them about what the tower is and how it will affect their lives. The disgruntled residents said the company did not even put out enough notices telling people to submit their objection letters.
You may also be interested in: City and CRL Commission reach consensus on burial practises
The Clarendon Road Neighbourhood watch’s Bronwyn Samuels added, “We stand by the community and will do all that we can to make sure the tower is not erected.”
The company said they’ve also received the go ahead from the Department of Health who confirmed that the low frequency non-ionizing radiation has no adverse health risks to the public.
Residents have until 1 June to lodge their objections.
Durban North ward councillor, Shaun Ryley, urged residents to be objective in their objection letters.
“It is important to be objective and list substantial reasons on why you’re opposing the erection of the tower. Group submissions will be taken as one submission,” he explained.
