Small businesses are in need of financial assistance as Covid-19 brisks the economy. Image: iStock
One of the key things business and economists will be awaiting news of during Finance Minister Tito Mboweni’s 2021 National Budget speech tomorrow is how South Africa’s much-vaunted R200 billion Covid-19 loan guarantee scheme will be overhauled.
Only around R18 billion of relief funding from the scheme has been approved by major banks (excluding direct relief offered by banks) for pandemic-hit small-and-medium businesses.
Several sectors, including organised business and labour, have called for a makeover of what was meant to be the biggest cog of government’s overall R500 billion Covid-19 relief and economic stimulus package.
Financial services and capital markets research house Intellidex says in a report published last week that the Loan Guarantee Scheme (LGS) is now “largely dead” or “moribund”.
It is the latest organisation to reiterate calls for an overhaul of the scheme, and has suggested further business support measures beyond just “bridging finance” as a stimulus to the country’s economic revival.
The 19-page report, which assesses the effectiveness of the scheme and proposes several “design tweaks” and recommendations, is written by Intellidex’s Stuart Theobald (founder), Peter Attard Montalto and Nolwandle Mthombeni.
They point out that President Cyril Ramaphosa, in his recent State of the Nation Address, “directed National Treasury to look at invigorating” the scheme.
However, they say Ramaphosa “did not provide any specifics”.
Attention will now be on what Mboweni reveals in his budget speech.
While Ramaphosa initially mentioned in April last year that the LGS is a R200-billion plan, the finance minister later clarified that the “first tranche” would be R100 billion.
It is unclear whether the full R200 billion for the scheme was in fact set aside.
However, with take-up in the scheme being lacklustre and virtually at a standstill presently, Mboweni may well announce tweaks and redirect the LGS balance (R100 billion second tranche) to new economic relief/stimulus efforts, or even for the funding of government’s Covid-19 vaccination drive.
“The headline R200-billion target was always unrealistic given the size of the small business sector that was targeted,” says Intellidex.
“There are further design tweaks that could improve the performance of the scheme.…These should include reduced
suretyship requirements; wider allowed uses for proceeds; increased cover by the guarantee [remove the 600-basis point first loss buffer faced by banks], an explicit budget set for losses in national accounts; an upfront commitment to targeted loan volumes by banks; and, potentially lower interest rates,” it points out.
“However, there needs to be development of quite different schemes that help companies to reduce their financial risk if we are to deliver financial solutions to stimulate the economy rather than bridge finance businesses through lockdowns, as the LGS was designed to do,” it adds.
“To achieve wider stimulus, schemes would need to crowd in offshore and onshore guarantees from development banks,” Intellidex explains.
The research house backs reforms such as Operation Vulindlela, which aims for better coordinated “work across government” as part of overall structural economic reforms for the country.
Specific reforms it cited as part of its LGS assessment include:
“All this is probably too complex to implement in the short run, but amendments can be undertaken so that there can be faster responses next time,” says Intellidex.
“In a constrained fiscal environment, maximum leverage from the private sector to support business [SMMEs in particular] is crucial.
“The LGS provides government a path towards supporting the economy through 2021 and on to the recovery, both by reforming the scheme and introducing different schemes that better meet the needs of the economy,” it stresses.
“The existing scheme is largely now dead,” Theobald, Attard-Montalto and Mthombeni note in the concluding section of the report.
“The scheme was intended to be a bridge finance tool, rather than broad stimulus one,” they say. “Debt stimulus is far better achieved through normal monetary policy that lowers the cost of debt.”
“However, future Covid-19 lockdown waves may provide good reason for it to come back to life, in a new form, as part of a wide package of bank-led support,” they add.
This article first appeared on Moneyweb and was republished with permission
For more news your way, download The Citizen’s app for iOS and Android.
Download our app and read this and other great stories on the move. Available for Android and iOS.
