“On 12 December 2022, I was poisoned with cyanide,” deposes former Eskom CEO André de Ruyter matter-of-factly in an affidavit before the Pretoria High Court.
De Ruyter provides no further elaboration on the poisoning, but we know from press reports that he became weak and dizzy after drinking a cup of coffee in his office at Eskom Megawatt Park in Sunninghill.
He was rushed to hospital by his security detail, and doctors quickly established that it was cyanide poisoning. A case of attempted murder was opened at Hermanus Police Station in the Western Cape on 5 January, before being transferred to the Sandton Police Station in Gauteng.
ALSO READ: De Ruyter’s been gone a few days – why is there still load shedding?
He was arguing on behalf of Eskom in a case brought by the United Democratic Movement (UDM) and 18 others in which they want the court to compel Eskom to provide sustained, reliable electricity to all South Africans in line with their rights and basic service delivery needs.
De Ruyter rebuts claims by the applicants that sabotage and criminality at Eskom is “an exaggerated risk”.
He had received several threats against his life prior to the poisoning, and was always accompanied by personal security.
ALSO READ: Government to take on Eskom’s debt of R254 billion
In May 2022, Eskom chief operating officer Jan Oberholzer received a bomb threat, allegedly from EFF Emalahleni branch chair Thapelo Mnisi, who was apparently disgruntled after being denied employment after being trained as a boilermaker at Kusile Power Station.
Eskom’s general manager for security, Advocate Karen Pillay, has said several Eskom executives have been the targets of threats in recent months.
De Ruyter’s affidavit before the Pretoria High Court provides more chilling evidence of the state of siege under which senior executives and managers at Eskom must operate.
The manager at Tutuka Power Station in Mpumalanga “has to wear a bulletproof vest when walking the stations and has to be accompanied by two bodyguards”.
“His wife and children also have to be accompanied by bodyguards all as a result of threats being made on his life,” says De Ruyter.
Despite being one of Eskom’s newest power stations, Tutuka operates an energy availability factor (EAF) of 15-17%, a sharp drop from the 30% recorded in 2022.
The causes of Tutuka’s underperformance are numerous, but “intolerable levels of criminality plaguing Tutuka are undoubtedly a significant contributor to its unacceptably low EAF,” according to De Ruyter.
Tutuka is not an isolated example. Eskom is spending about R3.2 billion a year on private security due to the sabotage and criminality inflicted on its plant and personnel.
Many instances of damage to Eskom property and operations have been deliberate.
“This is not always the case, but the sheer number of inexplicable incidents of damage to Eskom’s property, coupled with the substantial number in which intention is clear, overwhelmingly confirms that Eskom has experienced a sustained campaign of sabotage.”
Apart from threats to Eskom executives, De Ruyter details several instances of sabotage dating back to 2019.
De Ruyter says the demand by the UDM and fellow applicants in the case for sustained, reliable electricity to all South Africans would, if implemented, result in a potential blackout of the entire country that could last for two or more weeks.
This would likely result in the loss of many lives and would be impractical and far too costly to implement.
This article originally appeared on Moneyweb and was republished with permission.
Read the original article here.
NOW READ: DA writes to Mapisa-Nqakula calling for ad hoc committee to probe Eskom corruption
Download our app and read this and other great stories on the move. Available for Android and iOS.