Mining charter in current form won’t promote growth – Minerals Council SA

Minister of Mineral Resources Gwede Mantashe Photo: Gallo Images

Minister of Mineral Resources Gwede Mantashe Photo: Gallo Images

The council believes Gwede Mantashe’s new version is better, but won’t be good for competition.

The latest draft mining charter is a material improvement on a previous version, but much more work needs to be done to create a charter that promotes competitiveness, investment, growth, and transformation, the Minerals Council South Africa said on Sunday.

The council said in a statement it had noted the charter’s publication by the mineral resources department (DMR) on Friday, June 15, and that interested parties had 30 days to respond to the draft.

“The Minerals Council recognises that the mining charter 2018 is a material improvement on the 2017 mining charter. The Minerals Council believes that much more work needs to be done to create a mining charter that promotes competitiveness, investment, growth and transformation for the growth and prosperity of South Africa,” it said.

The council supported a 30 percent black ownership target on new mining rights, with shares allocated for communities, organised labour, and black entrepreneurs.

However, it did not support some of the elements of the new draft. Most importantly, some of the elements of the charter did not promote competitiveness. Without competitiveness, investment in new exploration and mining would be limited and the current mining sector would continue to decline to the detriment of all citizens. This was directly contrary to President Cyril Ramaphosa’s stated intention to attract US100 billion in foreign investment into South Africa in the next five years.

Further, the charter contained elements that were unconstitutional and contrary to South African company law.

The council did not support the “free carried interest” of five percent allocated to each of labour and communities. Given South Africa’s mature mining sector, a 10 percent total free carried interest on new mining rights would materially undermine investment by pushing up investment hurdle rates and ensuring that many potentially new projects became unviable.

“Imposition of a free carried interest is a public policy choice which must be weighed against the critical need to attract investment for growth and employment creation. The Minerals Council believes that there are other measures to ensure benefits to communities and employees that would not undermine the viability of mining in the future and will continue to engage with the DMR on potential measures.

“The Minerals Council is pleased to see that the minister recognises that ‘free carry’ is indeed not free and has costs associated with it; the minister has also in his discussion at the media briefing held today [Sunday] acknowledged that ‘in kind’ participation could be considered,” the statement said.

The council did not support the one percent earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortisation (EBITDA) target to communities and labour proposed by DMR. This was not agreed as a recommendation in the charter task team so was a surprise addition.

“The issue of topping up existing right holders’ BEE ownership to 30 percent within five years was never agreed as a recommendation in the charter task team, and so this is another surprise inclusion by the DMR. The Minerals Council does not support this top up, as it prejudices existing right holders that secured their rights on the basis of the 2004 and 2010 charters.

“Despite a High Court declaratory order judgment and an agreement with the DMR the issue of recognising the continuing consequences of previous BEE deals on existing rights, including for renewals, has not been properly captured in the mining charter.

“It is the Minerals Council’s view that the mining charter should involve all stakeholders in growing the competitiveness, investment, and transformation in the sector. For mining companies in new rights applications to carry a 10 percent free-carried interest and an EBITDA-based income stream for communities and labour comes in addition to the industry’s social and labour plan requirements, skills development requirements (R7 billion per annum), the existing royalties (R6 billion per annum), and corporate taxes,” the council said.

The lack of recognition of the need to phase-in or graduate the charter’s requirements for junior and emerging mining companies was disappointing. While the council supported transformation of all elements of the exploration and mining value chain, the application of a 30 percent black ownership target to new greenfields prospecting rights would result in a continuation of limited exploration, the lifeblood of new projects for the industry.

The council would continue to engage the DMR and other stakeholders. It would make a comprehensive submission to the DMR (including at the mining summit) on the key issues that needed to be changed or resolved to achieve competitiveness, growth, and transformation.

“The Minerals Council urges the DMR and other stakeholders to take on board the significant need to improve the competitiveness of the industry to ensure investment, growth, and the transformation of the mining sector. Ultimately, we are all seeking a mining charter that all stakeholders can support and defend,” the council said.

– African News Agency (ANA)






today in print